Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 3, 2006 10:59am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SHN vs. FLAC

Damn--so shns really are not strictly 'lossless?' Holy crap, batman. Bummer.

Thanks for all the info, though I will need more of your bottom lines as I am slow on this uptake.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: tigerbolt Date: Dec 3, 2006 11:07am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SHN vs. FLAC

hey william shn is lossless it's just flac is a upgrade and for now the future,until another program is invented.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 3, 2006 11:21am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SHN vs. FLAC

Cool; thanks tiger.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: deadmax Date: Dec 3, 2006 11:06am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SHN vs. FLAC

That's the part I'm looking at. When I said better sound I meant better compression. Didn't mean to mislead, I was including some material I read that was floating in my brain and it came out at the wrong time. One article did say the sound was better but I didn't get to follow that idea.


I'll look more and let you guys know.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Dec 3, 2006 11:22am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: SHN vs. FLAC

Thanks; much appreciated. Big sigh of relief here.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)